This event scores 18.73 on constitutional damage (A) and 19.19 on distraction/hype (B), with D=-0.46. The A-score reflects serious civil_rights concerns (4.0) around freedom of association and advocacy, rule_of_law erosion (3.5) through potential weaponization of executive power against advocacy groups, and capture dynamics (2.5) targeting environmental opposition. However, the mechanism_modifier of 0.65 significantly reduces the score since this is 'norm_erosion_only' with no concrete legal mechanism yet implemented—these are considerations, not enacted orders. The B-score is elevated by high media_friendliness (8) and outrage_bait (7) given environmental groups' sympathetic public profile, plus Layer 2 strategic indicators showing mismatch (6) and pattern_match (7) with authoritarian targeting of civil society. Intentionality score of 8 reflects clear targeting of political opposition through advocacy suppression. Both scores exceed 25 threshold when considering base scores, but final scores land in high teens with |D|<10, making this Mixed—real constitutional concerns about First Amendment and associational rights, but also significant hype potential around 'Trump vs. environment' narrative.