This event scores 27.54 on constitutional damage (A) and 25.03 on distraction/hype (B), with D=+2.51. The forced sale of TikTok's US operations represents significant constitutional concerns around civil rights (speech platform control, 3/5), regulatory capture (government-mandated corporate restructuring favoring specific buyers, 4/5), and rule of law (enforcement of divestment requirements, 2/5). The policy_change mechanism at federal scope with broad population impact yields modifiers of 1.15 and 1.3. Severity shows moderate durability (1.2 - creates precedent for forced tech sales) but higher reversibility (0.9 - future administrations could alter approach) and precedent concerns (1.1 - establishes template for foreign-owned platform regulation). The B-score reflects substantial media coverage (Layer 1: 66/100) with tech industry drama, corporate dealmaking, and national security narrative. Layer 2 strategic elements (50/100) include timing around regulatory deadlines and market positioning. Intentionality indicators (corporate PR timing, strategic announcement, market positioning) yield 6/15, producing intent_weight of 0.55. Both scores exceed 25 with |D|<10, qualifying as Mixed - genuine constitutional implications around speech platform ownership and regulatory power, but also significant corporate/market hype around the deal structure and buyer identities.