White House requesting updates on individual activist arrest represents concerning executive overreach into law enforcement operations. Rule_of_law (3.5): Executive branch monitoring specific arrests suggests politicization of justice system, though single incident limits score. Separation (3.0): Direct White House involvement in arrest updates crosses traditional boundaries between executive political operations and law enforcement independence. Civil_rights (3.5): Targeting activist specifically raises First Amendment concerns about chilling effect on dissent. Capture (2.5): Pattern suggests executive apparatus being used for political monitoring. Corruption (2.0): Potential abuse of position for political intelligence gathering. Enforcement_action mechanism adds 1.3x multiplier as it involves direct government coercive power. Federal scope with narrow population (0.9x) reflects limited immediate impact but concerning precedent. Severity multipliers: durability 1.1 (creates monitoring precedent), precedent 1.2 (normalizes executive surveillance of activists). B-score elevated by outrage_bait (7) around government overreach narrative, pattern_match (7) with historical political targeting fears, and mismatch (6) between alleged surveillance and democratic norms. However, single-source attribution through attorney and vague details ('allegedly') limit verification, raising intentionality concerns. Delta of +13.19 places firmly in List A territory - genuine constitutional concern about executive branch politicization of law enforcement, despite some hype amplification.