This is a routine administrative budget cut affecting state-level food assistance infrastructure. Constitutional damage is minimal: civil_rights scores 3 for impact on vulnerable populations' access to food assistance, rule_of_law scores 1 for administrative process concerns, capture scores 1 for potential policy capture dynamics. The resource_reallocation mechanism adds 15% modifier, but single_state scope reduces by 15%. Final A-score of 8.47 is well below the 25 threshold. B-score of 15.99 reflects moderate outrage potential around food insecurity but lacks viral characteristics or strategic timing indicators. The event represents normal budgetary policy adjustment within existing administrative frameworks, not constitutional degradation. Single article from regional source, single-state impact, and routine nature all indicate noise rather than systematic threat.