This is a routine Supreme Court administrative decision allowing a financial transparency rule to proceed. The A-score is extremely low (0.22) because: (1) rule_of_law=1 (minor procedural validation), (2) civil_rights=1 (minimal privacy concerns for business registration), (3) corruption=2 (anti-money laundering is positive governance). No mechanism specified for constitutional damage. Severity multipliers near baseline (0.8-0.9) as this is reversible regulatory action. Mechanism modifier 0.5 (no actual damage mechanism). Scope modifier 0.7 (federal but narrow population). B-score also very low (2.2) with minimal media appeal or strategic distraction value. This is clearly administrative noise - a routine court decision upholding financial regulation with no constitutional crisis elements.