This event scores as Mixed (A=19.47, B=26.01, D=-6.54). Constitutional damage centers on separation of powers (5) - federal executive attempting to deploy National Guard over state objections represents significant federalism violation, though Supreme Court check functioned properly. Rule of law (4) reflects the attempted override of traditional state control. The policy_change mechanism receives 0.7 modifier as this is a reversal/withdrawal rather than new imposition. Multi-state scope adds 1.15x. Severity modifiers reflect that withdrawal reduces durability (0.9) and improves reversibility (0.85), but the precedent of attempting such deployment scores 1.1. Civil rights (2) for potential surveillance/enforcement implications, violence (1) for militarization context. Distraction score is elevated: Layer 1 benefits from media-friendly narrative (7) of Supreme Court defeat, novelty (5) of withdrawal announcement, outrage potential (6) across political spectrum. Layer 2 shows strong mismatch (8) between constitutional crisis averted and dramatic framing, timing (7) of post-SCOTUS loss announcement, narrative pivot (6) from tough-on-crime to retreat. Intentionality (8) evident in coordinated multi-city announcement following legal defeat. Both scores exceed 25 threshold with delta of -6.54, placing firmly in Mixed category - real constitutional tension around federalism and National Guard control, but heavily dramatized withdrawal creates significant distraction from underlying power grab attempt.