Active duty military deployment for domestic border enforcement scores 29.2 on constitutional damage through significant separation of powers concerns (4.0 - Posse Comitatus Act tensions, military vs civilian law enforcement boundaries), election integrity implications (3.5 - deployment timing and immigration as electoral wedge), and rule of law questions (3.0 - statutory authority boundaries). Enforcement action mechanism adds 1.25x modifier, multi-state scope 1.15x. Severity multipliers reflect moderate precedent concerns (1.15 - normalizing military in domestic enforcement) but reversibility (0.95 - deployments can be withdrawn). B-score of 28.7 driven by high outrage potential (7.5 - military on US soil for immigration), strong media appeal (8.0 - visual imagery of troops), and strategic timing (7.0 - likely election-proximate or policy announcement coordination). Intentionality moderate (9/15) with election proximity and symbolic deployment indicators. Delta of +0.5 places this firmly in Mixed territory - genuine constitutional questions about military domestic deployment coexist with substantial political theater and media amplification around border security narratives.