Filing recall petitions against 8 House Democrats represents partisan electoral maneuvering with moderate constitutional implications. A-score: Election integrity driver scores 3.5 (weaponizing recall mechanism for partisan advantage, targeting multiple legislators simultaneously), rule_of_law 2.0 (procedural abuse of recall process), civil_rights 1.0 (voter disenfranchisement concerns). Mechanism modifier 1.15 for election_admin_change. Single-state scope reduces to 0.75. Severity: durability 0.9 (recalls can be defeated), reversibility 1.1 (sets precedent for tit-for-tat recalls), precedent 1.0 (normalizes partisan recall weaponization). Final A=15.36. B-score: High outrage potential (7) targeting partisan divide, moderate novelty (6) as recall tactics escalate, media-friendly (7) conflict narrative. Layer 2: pattern_match (6) fits broader election subversion narrative, narrative_pivot (5) shifts from policy to procedural warfare. Intentionality clear at 9 (explicit partisan strategy, coordinated targeting). Final B=19.89. D=-4.53 favors distraction. B exceeds 25 threshold marginally when considering intentionality modulation, but primary classification is B-list due to strategic partisan theater overwhelming modest constitutional damage.