A-score (23.51): Civil rights driver scores 4.5 for direct impact on vulnerable population (families/children) with detention conditions affecting due process and humane treatment. Rule of law 3.5 for policy change affecting legal standards around asylum/detention. Separation 2.0 for executive action without clear legislative mandate. Violence 1.5 for psychological harm and documented trauma from family detention. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for policy_change with federal scope modifier 1.2. Severity: durability 1.1 (can persist through administration), reversibility 0.95 (policy reversible but individual harm not), precedent 1.05 (revives controversial practice). B-score (23.85): Layer 1 high on outrage_bait (8) - families/children detention is emotionally charged, media_friendliness (7) - visual/narrative appeal. Layer 2 strong on pattern_match (8) - echoes 2018 separation controversy, narrative_pivot (7) - shifts from other issues, mismatch (6) - humanitarian concerns vs enforcement framing. Intentionality 9/15 for deliberate policy reversal of known controversial practice with predictable reaction. Classification: Both scores near 24-25 threshold with D=-0.34, placing in Mixed category - real constitutional concerns around civil rights and due process combined with high media amplification of emotionally charged immigration issue.