This event scores low on constitutional damage (1.7) as it represents faculty opposition to potential enforcement actions rather than actual constitutional harm. The mechanism is defensive/preventive (faculty condemning calls), not an actual enforcement action, warranting 0.6 mechanism modifier. Civil_rights scores 3 for First Amendment protest concerns, rule_of_law 2 for selective enforcement issues. Single-state scope with narrow population yields 0.7 modifier. B-score is high (25.3) due to strong outrage dynamics around deportation rhetoric (7), identity politics layering (Jewish faculty defending protesters), and strategic counter-narrative timing. The framing creates high media appeal and narrative pivot potential. D-score of -23.6 clearly indicates List B classification - this is primarily a symbolic institutional statement generating attention around protest politics rather than substantive constitutional damage.