This event involves the White House proactively addressing potential role conflicts for Secretary Rubio, representing routine administrative coordination rather than constitutional damage. A-score (11.15) reflects modest concerns: capture (3) for dual-role concentration, separation (2) for potential executive branch coordination issues, rule_of_law (1) and corruption (1) for conflict-of-interest management. Mechanism modifier 1.15 applied for personnel_capture at federal scope. However, the proactive nature ('actively working to address') indicates transparency and conflict prevention rather than institutional capture. B-score (9.79) shows moderate media attention to early administration personnel decisions. Both scores fall well below thresholds (A<25, B<25). Critical noise indicators: this is standard administrative process for managing dual responsibilities, represents preemptive transparency rather than damage, involves routine personnel coordination, and lacks actual constitutional mechanism or institutional harm. The 'working to address' framing suggests problem-solving rather than problem-creation. Classification: Noise.