Weekly civic intelligence report · v2.2
Elon Musk and SpaceX are lobbying the Trump trade representative regarding tariff policy, demonstrating direct corporate influence on trade policy. This represents potential conflicts of interest in policy-making.
Corporate lobbying on tariffs is routine business advocacy. While Musk's prominence elevates media attention (B=21.52), the constitutional damage is modest (A=16.93). Capture score reflects potential influence but lobbying trade representatives is standard practice across industries. No evidence of policy capture completion, just advocacy. Separation of powers minimally affected as executive branch trade policy is within normal authority. The mechanism is policy_change but represents routine regulatory engagement rather than constitutional erosion. High media friendliness due to Musk's celebrity status but substantively this is normal corporate-government interaction.
Monitor for actual policy outcomes favoring SpaceX/Tesla interests that deviate from broader industry positions or national interest. Track if Musk receives preferential access or treatment compared to other corporate actors. Escalate only if concrete evidence emerges of quid pro quo arrangements or policy capture mechanisms being institutionalized.