This event involves law firms suing over executive orders 'targeting them' - suggesting self-interested litigation rather than broad constitutional challenge. Rule_of_law scores 3.5 (legal process functioning normally, judicial review operating as designed) and separation scores 3.0 (checks/balances working, not being undermined). The mechanism_modifier is 1.15 for judicial_legal_action as it's a constitutional check. However, A-score of 11.9 falls well below the 25 threshold. B-score reaches 19.7 with moderate media appeal (law firms vs administration narrative) but lacks the intensity for List B. Critical issue: extremely limited information - no details on what orders, what alleged violations, what relief sought. 'Targeting them' suggests orders affecting law firms specifically (narrow population confirmed), making this potentially self-interested commercial litigation dressed as constitutional challenge. This is routine adversarial legal process, not constitutional crisis. The lawsuit itself is the check working, not evidence of damage.