This event involves an expert opinion piece arguing against federal access to Oregon voter data, but lacks concrete mechanism of constitutional damage. A-score: Election integrity (2) and civil rights/privacy (2) concerns are present but theoretical. Rule of law (1) and separation of powers (1) minimally implicated by federal-state data dynamics. No actual capture, corruption, or violence. Severity reduced (0.9/1.0/0.9) as this is preventative discussion. Mechanism modifier 0.5 due to null mechanism - no actual federal request or action documented. Scope 0.7 for single state, moderate population. Final A: 3.02. B-score: High outrage potential (5) around privacy invasion, strong media friendliness (6) for data privacy narratives. Layer 2 shows significant mismatch (7) - expert opinion framed as urgent threat without documented federal action. Timing (4) and pattern matching (5) to broader election integrity debates. Low intentionality (4) suggests defensive positioning. Final B: 17.35. Classification: Noise - A-score below 25, no concrete mechanism, speculative threat based on expert opinion rather than actual federal action or policy change.