Federal tribal recognition is a legitimate administrative action with minimal constitutional implications. Civil_rights scores 2 (0.14×2=0.28) for expanding federal recognition to a Native American community, but this is routine executive authority under existing statutory frameworks. No mechanism of constitutional damage identified - this is standard executive implementation of tribal recognition policy. Scope is federal but population is narrow (single tribe). B-score is minimal: Layer1=2.75 (novelty and media coverage of campaign promise), Layer2=0.9 (timing as promise fulfillment), intentionality=4 (campaign promise context). Final B=3.0. Both scores well below thresholds (A=2.8, B=3.0). This is routine governance - expanding rights rather than restricting them, using established executive authority, affecting narrow population. Clear noise event.