This is routine policy change through normal legislative process. Budget allocations for renewable energy programs are standard political decisions that don't implicate constitutional mechanisms. The only minimal A-score driver is 'capture' (1/5) reflecting potential industry influence on energy policy, but this is speculative and weak. No election interference, rule of law violations, separation of powers issues, civil rights impacts, or violence. The policy is reversible through future legislation, sets no constitutional precedent, and operates through normal democratic channels. B-score is low (3.85) - some media interest in climate policy but no viral potential or strategic distraction indicators. This is ordinary political disagreement over budget priorities, not constitutional damage.