This event scores moderately on both scales (A: 18.55, B: 19.45) but is flagged as Noise due to its anticipatory nature. The 'expected to' framing indicates speculation rather than actual action. On A-scale: capture driver scores 4.0 (personnel_capture mechanism, potential expertise displacement), rule_of_law 2.5 (norm erosion around merit-based appointments), corruption 2.0 (potential loyalty-over-competence), separation 1.5 (executive branch institutional independence). Mechanism modifier 1.15 applied for personnel_capture. However, no actual appointment has occurred. On B-scale: Layer 1 scores 20/40 (media-friendly health agency story, moderate outrage potential), Layer 2 scores 18/40 (fits pattern narrative of loyalist appointments, timing during transition). The critical issue is this is predictive reporting about an expected action, not documentation of an actual constitutional event. Until an actual appointment occurs with demonstrable lack of qualifications or clear loyalty-over-merit dynamics, this remains speculative noise.