FCC commissioner investigating media company for diversity policies represents significant constitutional damage through regulatory capture (4), rule of law erosion (4), and separation of powers concerns (4). The FCC lacks clear statutory authority to investigate diversity policies, making this enforcement action a potential abuse of regulatory power. Election interference (3) as targeting media during political period, civil rights (3) as DEI policies relate to protected classes. Mechanism modifier 1.3 for enforcement_action with questionable legal basis. Severity: durability 1.1 (sets regulatory precedent), reversibility 0.9 (can be challenged/reversed), precedent 1.2 (novel use of FCC authority). Scope 1.15 for federal action against major media company. Base=(3×0.22+4×0.18+4×0.16+3×0.14+4×0.14+2×0.10+0×0.06)×5=28.28. Final=28.28×1.1×0.9×1.2×1.3×1.15=42.8. B-score: High outrage (8), media-friendly story (9), novelty (7) of FCC investigating DEI. Layer 2 shows strategic mismatch (7) between FCC authority and DEI oversight, narrative pivot (8) from content regulation to social policy, pattern match (7) with broader anti-DEI campaign. Intentionality 11/15 (political timing, Disney as symbolic target, aligns with administration narrative). Delta=+10.6 qualifies as List A.