This event involves a judge considering whether to issue a temporary restraining order against National Guard deployment in Portland. Constitutional drivers: rule_of_law (3.5) for judicial review of executive military deployment; separation (4.0) for federalism tensions and Posse Comitatus Act implications; civil_rights (2.5) for potential First/Fourth Amendment concerns with military policing; violence (1.0) for context of civil unrest. Enforcement_action mechanism adds 15% modifier. Single_state scope reduces by 15%. Severity: slightly reduced durability (0.9) and reversibility (0.95) as this is preliminary injunctive relief, not final ruling; precedent (1.05) for judicial oversight of military deployment. Base A-score: 17.96, final: 18.5. B-score: High media_friendliness (7) and outrage_bait (6) for military-in-cities narrative; pattern_match (7) fits federal overreach storyline; mismatch (5) as preliminary hearing generates outsized attention; narrative_pivot (6) for state-rights framing. Intentionality moderate (7) for strategic narrative deployment. Final B: 23.8. Classification: NOISE - A-score below 25 threshold, this is preliminary judicial consideration without final constitutional determination, represents temporary/reversible action, and localized dispute without broader systemic impact. The 'judge to decide' framing emphasizes uncertainty rather than actual constitutional damage.