Weekly civic intelligence report · v2.2
Federal policy change allows police departments to use federal funding for drone purchases, expanding surveillance capabilities.
Federal policy enabling drone purchases for police represents meaningful constitutional concern through civil rights (privacy/Fourth Amendment, 3.5), rule of law (surveillance expansion without clear oversight, 2.5), and capture (federal funding mechanisms directing local policing, 2.0). Policy mechanism modifier 1.15x and federal scope 1.2x apply. Severity multipliers reflect moderate durability (funding streams persist, 1.2), reversibility (requires policy reversal, 1.1), and precedent (normalizes surveillance infrastructure, 1.15). A-score 18.9 falls below List A threshold of 25. B-score modest: surveillance technology generates some outrage (3) and media interest (3.5) but limited viral potential (2) and novelty (2.5). Layer 2 shows pattern-matching to surveillance state narratives (2) but minimal strategic manipulation. D-score +9.8 indicates constitutional substance exceeds hype but neither threshold met.
Monitor implementation: track which departments receive funding, drone deployment policies, oversight mechanisms, and any Fourth Amendment challenges. Watch for mission creep from stated purposes to broader surveillance applications.