Weekly civic intelligence report · v2.2
Coordinated protests against Trump's executive power expansion occurred across multiple US cities including Minneapolis, Chicago, Dallas, Nashville, Charlotte, Denver, and NYC. Protesters opposed Trump administration policies and executive overreach.
This is a textbook information operation with minimal constitutional damage. A-score: Protests are protected First Amendment activity (civil_rights driver scores 5 for exercise of rights, not damage). No actual constitutional harm occurs - citizens exercising speech rights. Mechanism_modifier=0.0 because 'information_operation' describes the protest coordination itself, not constitutional damage mechanism. Base calculation: (0.14×5)×0.512×1.15=0.41, rounds to 0. B-score: Extremely high hype signature. Layer1=8.5/10 (outrage:9 for anti-executive framing, meme:8 for 'No Kings' branding, novelty:7 for coordinated scale, media:10 for 20 articles with live coverage). Layer2=9.0/10 (mismatch:10 - massive coverage of constitutionally-protected protests framed as crisis; timing:9 - counter-programming Trump's birthday military parade; narrative_pivot:8 - shifts from policy specifics to monarchy metaphor; pattern_match:9 - classic coordinated resistance theater). Intentionality=14/15 (coordinated nationwide branding, synchronized timing, counter-event strategy, explicit information_operation mechanism). Final: 46.75+20.55=67.3. Classification: B=67.3, A=0, D=-67.3 (<<-10) = List B. This is coordinated political theater generating massive media amplification of routine protest activity with zero constitutional damage.
LIST B - Pure distraction/hype event. Information operation successfully generated nationwide media saturation (20+ articles, live coverage) for constitutionally-protected protests. The 'No Kings' branding and counter-programming of military parade created compelling narrative theater, but represents normal democratic function, not constitutional crisis. Monitor for: (1) whether protest coverage obscures actual policy analysis, (2) if 'executive overreach' claims involve specific constitutional violations vs. rhetorical framing, (3) pattern of coordinated branding campaigns substituting for substantive accountability mechanisms. The high intentionality score (14/15) indicates sophisticated information operation, but directed at legitimate political expression rather than constitutional subversion.