This event represents judicial oversight functioning as designed - a federal judge pausing executive action pending review. Rule_of_law scores 4 (judicial review working, temporary pause on policy expansion), separation scores 4 (checks and balances operating, judiciary constraining executive), civil_rights scores 3 (immigration due process implications, moderate population affected). The mechanism_modifier is 0.7 because this is a PAUSE/temporary injunction, not a final ruling - it's procedural rather than substantive constitutional damage. The action preserves status quo rather than creating new precedent. Severity multipliers reflect temporary nature (durability 0.9, reversibility 0.85) though precedent is moderate (0.95) as immigration judicial review is established. Base score 24.2 drops to final 16.2 after modifiers. B-score reflects moderate hype: immigration is perpetually media-friendly (7) and outrage-generating (6), timing aligns with early administration enforcement push (5), pattern matches ongoing immigration battles (6). However, novelty is limited (4) as judicial pauses on immigration orders are routine. Final B-score 18.6. With A=16.2 and B=18.6, neither threshold (25) is met. This is routine judicial process on a politically charged topic - the system working normally, not constitutional crisis or manufactured distraction.