This is a quintessential List B event - high distraction/hype with minimal constitutional damage. A-score is low (3.1) because: (1) This is a private civil lawsuit by Trump against a private entity, not government action affecting constitutional order; (2) While it invokes 'weaponization' framing, the actual mechanism is standard civil litigation that will be adjudicated through normal judicial processes; (3) Rule_of_law score is moderate (3.5) only because frivolous lawsuits by powerful figures can strain judicial resources, but this is reversible through dismissal; (4) No direct impact on elections, separation of powers, or systemic capture; (5) Narrow scope affecting only parties to litigation. B-score is very high (35.2) due to: (1) Massive outrage potential on both sides - supporters see corporate discrimination, critics see frivolous litigation; (2) Highly media-friendly with celebrity CEO, round $5B number, 'debanking' buzzword; (3) Strong Layer 2 indicators - significant mismatch between constitutional impact and attention, perfect timing for Trump's political narrative about persecution, fits pattern of Trump litigation as political theater; (4) High intentionality (13/15) with round damages figure, political framing, Trump as plaintiff. Delta of -32.1 clearly places this on List B - designed to generate attention and political narrative rather than pose constitutional threat.