This is a textbook information operation distraction. A former president commenting on a ceasefire is routine diplomatic commentary with zero constitutional impact. The entire 'story' is manufactured around what Obama DIDN'T say (Trump's name), converting normal diplomatic remarks into tribal outrage bait. Layer 1: High outrage_bait (7) - designed to trigger partisan anger over perceived slight; strong media_friendliness (8) - simple narrative about political snub; moderate meme_ability (6) - 'Obama snubs Trump' spreads easily; low novelty (3) - ex-presidents commenting on foreign policy is standard. Layer 2: High mismatch (8) - enormous gap between trivial omission and manufactured significance; strong timing (7) - capitalizes on ceasefire news cycle; moderate narrative_pivot (6) - shifts from substantive ceasefire analysis to personality conflict; strong pattern_match (7) - classic 'disrespect' narrative. Intentionality at 11/15: clear framing choice to emphasize omission, manufactured controversy from normal statement, tribal signaling to partisan audiences. B-score 28.6 with A-score 0 yields clear List B classification.