This is the routine conclusion of a criminal prosecution - prosecutors resting their case is standard trial procedure. While the underlying alleged crime (assassination attempt) was serious, THIS EVENT is merely the procedural completion of the prosecution phase. Rule_of_law scores 4 because the justice system is functioning normally (positive reinforcement), but the 0.3 mechanism modifier applies because judicial_legal_action that reinforces rather than damages constitutional norms receives heavy discount. Severity multipliers at 0.8 reflect this is a transient procedural milestone with no lasting impact. Final A-score 1.38 is far below threshold. B-score elevated due to Trump name recognition (outrage_bait:8, media_friendliness:9) but novelty low (2) as trial conclusions are routine. This is classic noise: routine legal process completion with no constitutional implications beyond normal system function.