This event scores extremely low on constitutional damage (0.4) as it represents an individual's personal decision with no institutional mechanism or systemic impact. The rejection of a pardon is a private choice with minimal rule_of_law implications (scored 1/5 for symbolic relevance only). No mechanism exists for constitutional harm - this is purely an individual action. However, the B-score is high (27.9) due to strong novelty (unexpected reversal of typical pardon acceptance), high media_friendliness (human interest story with moral dimension), and significant mismatch potential (complicates narratives about Jan 6 defendants and Trump's pardon power). The story generates attention through its counter-intuitive nature while having virtually zero constitutional impact. D-score of -27.5 clearly indicates List B classification.