This event involves a temporary judicial block on a single deportation case. While it demonstrates separation of powers (judicial review of executive action), the 'briefly blocks' language indicates a temporary, procedural intervention rather than substantive constitutional impact. Rule_of_law scores 3.5 for judicial process functioning, separation scores 3.8 for checks-and-balances operation, civil_rights scores 2.5 for individual due process protection. However, severity multipliers are low (0.8-0.9) because temporary injunctions are reversible, routine, and establish no binding precedent. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for judicial action, scope modifier 0.95 for federal but narrow population. Base score 14.96 reduces to final 13.2. B-score elevated by outrage_bait (5) around deportations and media_friendliness (5) for 'resistance' narrative, plus timing during deportation surge (4) and pattern_match (4) to broader immigration conflict stories. Final B-score 18.5. Critical: A-score below 25 threshold, single case with no mechanism establishing systemic change, temporary nature, and narrow population all indicate routine judicial process noise rather than constitutional event.