This event represents routine judicial oversight functioning as designed. Rule_of_law=4 (judicial check on executive enforcement), separation=3 (judiciary reviewing executive action), civil_rights=4 (due process protection for detained individuals). However, mechanism_modifier=0.7 (corrective judicial action, not damage), scope_modifier=0.6 (single state, 16 individuals). Final A-score 10.2 falls well below threshold. B-score 19.1 reflects moderate media attention around immigration enforcement but lacks strategic distraction indicators. This is constitutional machinery working correctly - a judge enforcing due process requirements is protective, not damaging. The narrow scope (16 people, one state) and corrective nature classify this as routine judicial oversight noise rather than constitutional crisis or manufactured distraction.