Weekly civic intelligence report · v2.2
A Trump administration official publicly encouraged buying Tesla stock, potentially violating securities laws. Legal experts noted no enforcement action is expected despite the apparent violation.
Rule of law (3.5): Securities law violation acknowledged by legal experts but no enforcement expected, creating selective enforcement precedent. Separation (2.5): Executive branch official using position for market manipulation without accountability checks. Capture (3): Direct promotion of specific corporate interest (Tesla/Musk) by government official. Corruption (3.5): Using official position for potential personal/political benefit through stock promotion. Mechanism modifier 0.7 for norm_erosion_only - no formal policy change but establishes dangerous precedent. Scope 0.9 for federal/narrow. Severity: durability 1.1 (precedent for future violations), precedent 1.2 (normalizes official stock promotion). Base: (3.5×0.18 + 2.5×0.16 + 3×0.14 + 3.5×0.10)×1.32×0.7×0.9 = 13.7. B-score: High outrage (6), media-friendly scandal (7), strong mismatch between violation and no enforcement (7), pattern matches Trump-Musk relationship (6). Intentionality moderate (8) for obvious connection. Layer1: 12.1, Layer2: 10.6×0.53 = 5.6, Total: 22.7. D-score: -9.0 suggests distraction lean but neither threshold met for pure classification.
Monitor for: (1) actual enforcement action or formal waiver, (2) similar violations by other officials, (3) whether this becomes normalized practice, (4) any financial disclosure showing official's Tesla holdings, (5) legislative response or ethics rule changes. Real damage is in precedent-setting for consequence-free securities violations by officials.