Event scores 27.4 on constitutional damage (A) and 29.2 on distraction/hype (B) with D=-1.8, qualifying as Mixed. A-score: Election impact (3.5) reflects immigration as campaign wedge issue; civil_rights (4.0) captures broad travel restrictions affecting protected classes; rule_of_law (3.0) for executive authority expansion; separation (2.5) for unilateral executive action. Policy_change mechanism adds +15% modifier, international scope +25%. Severity: durability +15% (policy entrenchment), reversibility -5% (executive orders reversible), precedent +10% (expands travel ban framework). B-score: Layer 1 (14.6/26.5): outrage_bait (8.5) for immigration hot-button issue, media_friendliness (8.0) for simple narrative, meme_ability (6.0) moderate, novelty (4.0) as expansion of existing policy. Layer 2 (14.6/18.5): pattern_match (8.0) echoes 2017 Muslim ban, timing (7.0) for early administration positioning, mismatch (6.0) between memo leak and actual implementation, narrative_pivot (5.5) shifts from other issues. Intentionality (9/15) for strategic memo leak, immigration narrative control, expansion framing. Both scores exceed 25 with |D|<10 = Mixed classification. Real constitutional implications (broad civil rights impact, executive overreach) but also significant strategic hype value (immigration wedge, base mobilization, media cycle dominance).