A-score 40.43: Civil rights driver scores 4 (targeting LGBTQ+ educational content, affecting vulnerable youth population access to inclusive information). Rule of law scores 3 (federal funding coercion to enforce ideological curriculum changes). Separation scores 2 (executive branch leveraging funding to dictate state educational content). Election scores 2 (culture war positioning). Mechanism modifier 1.25 for resource_reallocation (funding threats). Scope modifier 1.3 for federal action affecting state education systems. Severity: durability 1.1 (policy can persist through administrative inertia), reversibility 0.95 (relatively reversible through future admin), precedent 1.15 (establishes federal ideological curriculum enforcement model). B-score 70.85: Layer 1 scores high on outrage_bait (85, gender/LGBTQ+ issues maximally polarizing), media_friendliness (80, culture war narrative), meme_ability (70, 'gender ideology' phrase designed for viral spread). Layer 2: pattern_match (80, classic culture war playbook), mismatch (75, moderate population impact vs massive attention), narrative_pivot (70, shifts from governance to identity politics). Intentionality 12/15 with clear culture war framing, wedge issue activation, base mobilization signals. D-score: -30.42. Classification: List B (B>=25 AND D<=-10). This is a strategic distraction event using culture war mechanics to generate outrage disproportionate to actual constitutional damage, though real civil rights concerns exist for affected LGBTQ+ youth.