A-score 28.2: Civil rights driver scores 4.5 (reproductive healthcare access for veterans, protected class impact). Election driver 3.5 (abortion policy implementation post-Dobbs, politically charged timing). Rule of law 3.0 (policy change within executive authority but raises questions about statutory interpretation of VA healthcare mandate). Capture 3.0 (ideological control over veteran healthcare). Separation 2.5 (executive policy implementation). Severity multipliers: durability 1.1 (policy can persist), precedent 1.1 (sets template for other federal healthcare restrictions). Mechanism modifier 1.15 (policy change with immediate effect). Scope modifier 1.2 (federal, affects moderate population of female veterans). B-score 27.8: Layer 1 (14.1/25): High outrage bait 8.5 (abortion + veterans = dual emotional triggers), media friendliness 7.5 (clear narrative, sympathetic victims), novelty 5.5 (new restriction post-Dobbs), meme-ability 4.0 (moderate). Layer 2 (13.7/25): Pattern match 7.0 (fits broader reproductive rights rollback), narrative pivot 6.5 (shifts from general abortion debate to veteran healthcare), mismatch 6.0 (quiet implementation vs major policy change), timing 5.5 (post-election implementation window). Intentionality 9/15 (quiet rollout, no announcement, vulnerable population, strategic timing) yields 0.55 weight. Delta: +0.4 (A slightly exceeds B). Both scores exceed 25 threshold with delta under 10, indicating genuine constitutional concern amplified by strategic presentation and high emotional valence.