Pure distraction operation with zero constitutional impact. This is unverified speculation about a personnel appointment that hasn't happened, involving a highly polarizing figure (Laura Loomer) designed to generate outrage and engagement. No actual policy change, no mechanism of constitutional damage, no official announcement. Layer 1: High outrage bait (4.5) due to Loomer's controversial profile, strong meme-ability (4.0) and media friendliness (4.5) as clickbait, moderate novelty (3.5). Layer 2: Maximum mismatch (5) between hype and substance - this is pure rumor with no confirmation, moderate timing (3) as speculative future event, strong narrative pivot (4) shifting attention to personnel drama, strong pattern match (4) to classic distraction tactics. Intentionality score 12/15 indicates deliberate information operation: rumor amplification without sourcing, selection of maximally polarizing figure, speculative framing, no official confirmation, clear engagement farming. B-score 46.2 well above threshold. A-score 0 as no constitutional mechanism exists - this is speculation about a potential appointment with no actual governmental action.