A-score 29.95: Enforcement actions score high on civil_rights (5 - family separation, school arrests, detention conditions), rule_of_law (4 - systematic enforcement with procedural concerns including mistaken deportation), violence (2 - coercive state action), separation (2 - executive enforcement raising oversight questions). Severity multipliers: durability 1.1 (enforcement patterns persist), reversibility 0.95 (deportations reversible but difficult), precedent 1.15 (school arrests and offshore detention facilities set concerning precedents). Mechanism modifier 1.25 for enforcement_action with documented civil rights impacts. Scope 1.15 for federal action across multiple cities affecting moderate population. B-score 28.27: Layer 1 (16.5/30): High outrage (9 - school children arrests, shipping containers), strong media appeal (8 - visual/emotional elements), novelty (7 - Djibouti facility unusual), moderate meme potential (6). Layer 2 (11.77/15): Strong pattern match (8 - fits immigration debate), mismatch (7 - humanitarian vs enforcement framing), timing (6 - ongoing policy debate), narrative pivot (5). Intentionality 9/15 for coordinated multi-city operations with high-visibility targets. D-score +1.68 indicates both substantial constitutional concern AND significant hype, qualifying as Mixed.