This is a performative legislative stunt with near-zero probability of enactment. The bill represents symbolic theater advancing Trump's stated territorial ambitions but has no realistic path: Panama would never sell, international law prohibits forced acquisition, Senate would not pass, and even if passed would be unenforceable. Constitutional damage is minimal (rule_of_law:2 for challenging international treaty norms, separation:1 for legislative grandstanding) but heavily discounted by 0.3 mechanism modifier since this is merely introduced legislation with no enforcement mechanism. The B-score is extremely high: novelty of territorial acquisition rhetoric (9), high meme-ability (8), strong outrage generation (7), perfect media story (9). Layer 2 shows massive mismatch between legislative action and achievable outcome (8), timing coordinated with Trump statements (7), and pattern-matches to Trump-era provocative proposals (8). Strong intentionality signals (12/15) include Trump branding, symbolic gesture with no implementation path, and outrage farming. Final B-score 34.21 vs A-score 0.95 yields clear List B classification (D=-33.26). This is distraction theater masquerading as policy.