A-score (26.14): Enforcement actions targeting immigrant labor force create substantial constitutional concerns. Rule_of_law=4 (selective enforcement patterns, workplace raids raise due process questions), civil_rights=4 (broad impact on immigrant communities, chilling effects on labor rights, family separation risks), separation=1 (executive enforcement within authority but tension with economic/labor policy), violence=1 (potential for confrontational enforcement). Severity: durability=1.1 (enforcement patterns can persist), reversibility=0.9 (relatively reversible through policy change). Mechanism modifier 1.15 for enforcement_action with documented economic disruption. Scope modifier 1.2 for multi_state agricultural impact. B-score (26.01): Layer1=12.1/22 (outrage_bait=8 for food supply threat framing, media_friendliness=7 for economic angle, novelty=3 as immigration enforcement is ongoing). Layer2=11.7/26 (mismatch=7 between enforcement goals and economic consequences, pattern_match=8 fits immigration debate cycle, timing=6 early administration). Intentionality=8 (farm bureau coordination, strategic economic framing to pressure policy). D-score=+0.13 indicates near-perfect balance. Both scores exceed 25 with |D|<10, meeting Mixed classification criteria. Real constitutional concerns (workplace enforcement, civil liberties) coexist with strategic economic pressure campaign.