Proposed legislation to criminalize drone photography of military sites scores A=10.54 (below 25 threshold) and B=9.28. Civil_rights driver scores 3.5 for First Amendment/press freedom implications, rule_of_law 2.5 for creating new criminal penalties, separation 1.5 for executive-legislative coordination. Severity multipliers modest (1.1 durability, 1.1 precedent) as proposal stage with uncertain passage. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for policy_change with criminal enforcement. Scope modifier 0.95 for federal but narrow population (drone operators near military sites). B-score driven by outrage_bait (3.5 - surveillance/freedom angle) and media_friendliness (3.0 - visual/tech story). Layer 2 shows pattern_match (2.5) with security theater narratives. Low intentionality (4/15) suggests genuine security concern rather than strategic distraction. Classification: Noise - both scores well below 25 threshold, proposal stage without concrete implementation, affects narrow population, lacks constitutional mechanism damage despite civil liberties concerns.