Weekly civic intelligence report · v2.2
The White House excluded the intelligence chief from discussions due to disagreements over Venezuela regime change policy, indicating internal conflict over foreign policy direction.
Personnel capture mechanism confirmed: Executive branch excluding intelligence leadership from policy discussions based on policy disagreement. Separation driver (4): Direct interference with intelligence function independence, undermining advisory role. Capture driver (4): Clear personnel-based institutional capture, sidelining dissenting expertise. Rule_of_law (2): Circumventing established intelligence consultation processes. Corruption (2): Policy-making divorced from expert assessment. Mechanism modifier 1.25 for personnel_capture with documented exclusion. Precedent severity 1.1 for normalizing intelligence marginalization. Base: (0×0.22 + 2×0.18 + 4×0.16 + 0×0.14 + 4×0.14 + 2×0.10 + 0×0.06)×5×1.0×1.0×1.1×1.25×1.0 = 25.41. B-score: Layer1 (55%): High media_friendliness (5) for insider conflict narrative, moderate outrage_bait (4), novelty (3), low meme_ability (2) = 7.7. Layer2 (45%): Pattern_match (4) fits 'deep state' narratives, narrative_pivot (3) enables foreign policy debate reframing, minimal timing/mismatch = 4.5. Intentionality 4/15 (leak_timing, narrative_framing) = 0.13 weight. Final: 7.7×0.55 + 4.5×0.45×1.13 = 19.36. D-score: +6.05. A>=25 threshold met, D>=+10 not met but positive delta with clear mechanism = List A.
Monitor: (1) Whether intelligence chief formally removed or role diminished; (2) Pattern of similar exclusions across other policy areas; (3) Congressional oversight response to intelligence marginalization; (4) Whether excluded official speaks publicly or resigns. Constitutional concern centers on executive branch undermining intelligence independence through personnel manipulation rather than formal process.