This event represents a standard judicial check on executive action - a federal judge blocking planned SNAP benefit cuts. Rule_of_law scores 4 (executive compliance with judicial order, statutory interpretation), separation scores 4 (judicial branch checking executive branch authority over appropriations/benefits), civil_rights scores 3 (food assistance access for vulnerable populations). The mechanism_modifier is 0.7 (corrective judicial action, temporary injunction for November only, reversible through appeals or policy change). Scope_modifier 1.1 for federal-level action affecting broad population. Severity multipliers reduced: durability 0.9 (month-specific order, subject to appeal), reversibility 0.9 (administration can appeal or modify approach), precedent 1.0 (standard judicial review). Base score 20.3, final 15.7. B-score: Layer1 moderate (outrage_bait 6 for 'Trump vs food stamps' framing, media_friendliness 7 for clear good/bad narrative, novelty 4, meme_ability 3). Layer2 modest (pattern_match 4 for ongoing Trump-judiciary conflicts, timing 3 for November benefits deadline, mismatch 2, narrative_pivot 2). Intentionality 4 (judicial timing, benefits framing). Final B 15.9. Delta -0.2. Both scores below 25 threshold, this is routine judicial oversight of executive benefits administration, not constitutional crisis or major distraction.