Investigation into UC Berkeley over foreign funding scores A=10.5 (below 25 threshold) and B=25.9 (above 25 threshold) with D=-15.4, qualifying as List B. Constitutional damage is limited: enforcement_action mechanism provides +15% modifier, but single_state/narrow scope reduces impact (-15%). Rule_of_law concerns (2.5) reflect selective enforcement patterns; separation (2.0) involves executive pressure on academic institutions; civil_rights (2.0) addresses academic freedom chilling effects. However, existing legal frameworks for foreign funding disclosure limit severity. Distraction score is high: Layer 1 (12.7) driven by strong outrage_bait (6.5) targeting Berkeley's symbolic status and media_friendliness (7.0) of foreign influence narrative. Layer 2 (11.1) elevated by pattern_match (7.0) with broader anti-China/foreign influence campaigns and narrative_pivot (6.5) from domestic policy issues. Intentionality at 9/15 (0.54 weight) reflects selective_enforcement against politically opposed institution, symbolic_target choice, and narrative_alignment with administration themes. The investigation appears designed primarily for political signaling rather than substantive constitutional threat.