This is a routine administrative policy reversal affecting a narrow agricultural work program. Constitutional damage is minimal: rule_of_law (1) reflects standard executive policy discretion, capture (2) suggests potential industry influence but without clear evidence. The policy is easily reversible, affects a narrow population (sustainable beef producers), and establishes no significant precedent. B-score is low-moderate due to limited viral potential and strategic value. The event falls well below thresholds (A=3.3, B=9.1) and exhibits classic noise characteristics: routine administrative action, narrow scope, no constitutional mechanism engaged, and minimal broader impact. This is standard agricultural policy adjustment generating modest attention but lacking substantive constitutional or distraction significance.