This is proposed state legislation (not enacted) creating federalism tension around immigration enforcement. A-score: separation_of_powers (3.5) reflects state-federal jurisdictional conflict over immigration enforcement authority; rule_of_law (2.5) for attempting to restrict federal agents' lawful enforcement activities; civil_rights (2) for sanctuary protections but limited to specific venues. Policy_change mechanism at consideration stage warrants 1.15 modifier. Single_state scope reduces to 0.85. Severity: high reversibility (0.95) as easily repealed, moderate durability (0.9) as depends on political winds, standard precedent. Final A=7.45. B-score: Layer1 (14.3/26): high outrage_bait (7) targeting both pro/anti-immigration camps, strong media_friendliness (8) for churches/schools angle, moderate novelty (6) as sanctuary policies exist, moderate meme_ability (5). Layer2 (12.6/19): strong pattern_match (8) to sanctuary city debates, high timing (7) in current immigration enforcement climate, strong narrative_pivot (7) framing federal overreach, moderate mismatch (6). Intentionality 9/15 for clear political positioning and base mobilization. Final B=26.91. Delta=-19.46 clearly exceeds -10 threshold with B>25, qualifying as List B strategic distraction despite real federalism questions.