This event represents a procedural legislative preference rather than constitutional damage. While fragmenting budget bills could affect Congressional power dynamics (separation: 2.5) and potentially enable regulatory capture through less transparent appropriations (capture: 1.5), the constitutional impact remains modest (A=9.6). The mechanism is standard policy_change within executive prerogative. The distraction score (B=14.9) reflects moderate media attention to procedural matters but lacks viral qualities. Most critically, this is normal legislative negotiation - presidents routinely signal preferences on budget structure, and Congress retains full constitutional authority to accept or reject such approaches. The 'openness' language suggests flexibility rather than demand. Without actual implementation or constitutional violation, this scores as procedural noise within normal governance friction.