This event involves diplomatic threats against Haiti regarding an unspecified council action. Constitutional damage is minimal (A=1.36): rule_of_law scores 2 for diplomatic coercion norms, separation scores 1 for executive foreign policy discretion, civil_rights scores 1 for potential TPS/deportation impacts on narrow population. International scope (0.6) and policy_change mechanism (0.7) significantly reduce impact. Distraction score is moderate (B=14.69) with outrage_bait at 3 for immigration/deportation framing, pattern_match at 3 for fitting Trump administration immigration narrative. However, the threat is entirely vague ('unspecified action'), lacks detail on the council or specific constitutional mechanism, affects international relations rather than domestic constitutional order, and appears based on single-source reporting. This is classic diplomatic posturing noise - generates headlines without substantive constitutional impact or clear actionable threat.