This event scores high on both scales (A=30.2, B=28.6, D=+1.6). Constitutional damage is substantial: civil_rights driver scores 5 (direct First Amendment suppression of speech), rule_of_law scores 4 (government using enforcement power to chill protected speech), separation scores 3 (executive overreach into speech regulation), violence scores 2 (enforcement context creates fear). Information_operation mechanism adds 1.25x modifier. Severity multipliers reflect moderate durability (1.1 - policy can be reversed but chilling effects persist), high reversibility (0.95 - speech suppression is immediately reversible), and significant precedent (1.15 - normalizing government suppression of warnings about enforcement actions). Federal scope with broad population adds 1.15x. However, B-score is nearly equivalent at 28.6. Layer 1 hype is high: outrage_bait (8 - First Amendment + immigration enforcement), media_friendliness (7 - clear narrative), meme_ability (6 - 'government silencing warnings'), novelty (5 - specific tactic in ongoing immigration debate). Layer 2 strategic elements strong: pattern_match (8 - fits anti-Trump censorship narrative), mismatch (7 - conflates enforcement with speech suppression), timing (6 - early administration immigration push). Intentionality indicators present (mechanism, framing, scope) yield 9/15, creating 0.55 intent_weight that amplifies strategic layer. With both scores >25 and |D|<10, this is Mixed classification.