A-score 28.03: Enforcement operations score moderately on constitutional dimensions. Rule_of_law (3.5) reflects selective enforcement patterns and due process concerns around detention/tracking without criminal records. Civil_rights (4.0) captures Fourth Amendment search/seizure issues, equal protection concerns, and chilling effects on immigrant communities. Separation (1.5) reflects executive action within statutory authority but with minimal judicial oversight. Capture (2.0) for enforcement prioritization serving political agenda. Violence (1.0) for coercive state power and community fear. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for enforcement_action with documented civil liberties impacts. Scope modifier 1.1 for multi_state operations affecting moderate populations. B-score 27.53: High outrage_bait (8) - immigration enforcement generates intense emotional responses across political spectrum. Media_friendliness (7) - visual operations, resistance narratives, human interest angles. Layer2: Pattern_match (8) fits established Trump immigration crackdown narrative. Timing (7) - early administration signaling priorities. Mismatch (6) - enforcement scale vs actual threat assessment. Intentionality (9) - coordinated operations with clear political messaging objectives. D-score: +0.50 indicates near-perfect balance between constitutional impact and strategic distraction value.