USAID closure represents substantial constitutional damage through multiple vectors. Election integrity (3.5): eliminates independent foreign aid apparatus that could serve democratic accountability functions abroad and constrains future administrations' policy options. Rule of law (2.5): formal congressional notification suggests procedural compliance but unilateral executive restructuring of congressionally-authorized agency raises separation concerns. Separation of powers (3.0): executive dismantling of agency with congressional mandate and appropriations authority creates institutional precedent. Civil rights (1.5): indirect impacts on global human rights programs and democracy support. Capture (2.0): consolidates foreign aid under direct executive control, reducing institutional independence. Resource reallocation mechanism (1.3x) involves permanent structural change to federal architecture. Federal scope with broad population impact (1.2x) affects international relationships and aid recipients. Severity multipliers: high durability (1.2) as institutional elimination is difficult to reverse, moderate reversibility (1.1) requiring congressional action, significant precedent (1.2) for executive agency elimination. A-score: 38.3. B-score driven by high novelty (8) of eliminating major federal agency, strong outrage potential (7), media-friendly narrative (7), pattern matching (7) to broader government restructuring. Layer 2 shows mismatch (6) between policy substance and implementation speed, timing (5) within broader reorganization push. Moderate intentionality (6) from policy rollout timing. D-score: +15.2 clearly exceeds +10 threshold with A>=25, qualifying as List A.