DOJ enforcement action on citizenship revocation scores moderate constitutional concern (A=17.3) primarily through rule_of_law (3.5 - aggressive enforcement posture challenging established citizenship), civil_rights (3.0 - targeting naturalized citizens' fundamental status), and election (2.5 - immigration enforcement as political positioning). Enforcement mechanism adds 15% modifier. Severity shows moderate durability (1.1 - policy can persist), high reversibility (0.95 - administrative actions reversible), elevated precedent (1.15 - normalizing denaturalization). B-score (22.2) reflects high outrage potential (6.5 - citizenship stripping triggers visceral response) and media appeal (7.0 - clear narrative, immigrant rights angle), with moderate strategic value (mismatch 5.5, narrative_pivot 6.0 - fits enforcement/immigration debate framing). Intentionality moderate (8/15) for wedge issue dynamics. Delta D=-4.9 suggests slight hype tilt but neither threshold met (A<25, B<25). This represents genuine enforcement policy shift with proportional attention - not pure distraction but also not reaching constitutional crisis threshold given 'some immigrants' scope and existing denaturalization legal framework.