This is a procedural judicial action with limited constitutional impact. The DOJ motion to unseal grand jury exhibits is a standard legal process that occurs in transparency/FOIA contexts. Rule_of_law scored 3.5 for modest transparency enhancement and judicial process integrity. Corruption scored 2.5 as unsealing could reveal investigative findings about high-profile misconduct. However, this is narrow-scope (specific case exhibits), reversible (court can deny or limit unsealing), and lacks precedent-setting constitutional implications. Mechanism modifier 1.15 for judicial action. The A-score of 9.25 falls well below the 25 threshold. B-score is elevated (17.58) due to Epstein-Maxwell name recognition (outrage_bait:7, media_friendliness:8) and salacious associations, but still below 25. The second article about puppy training is pure tabloid noise. This is classic procedural legal action with high name-recognition hype but minimal constitutional substance—textbook Noise category.