A-score: Rule of law (4) reflects chilling effect on whistleblowing and potential abuse of leak prosecution authority. Civil rights (4) captures First Amendment press freedom implications and employee speech rights. Separation (3) reflects executive pressure on independent information flow. Capture (2) for potential silencing of oversight. Severity multipliers: durability 1.1 (institutional chilling), precedent 1.2 (normalizing aggressive leak prosecution). Mechanism modifier 1.15 for enforcement action with prosecutorial power. Scope 0.95 for federal/narrow population. Base: (0×0.22 + 4×0.18 + 3×0.16 + 4×0.14 + 2×0.14 + 1×0.10 + 0×0.06)×5 = 20.78. Final: 20.78×1.32×1.15×0.95 = 28.18. B-score: Layer 1 (55%): outrage_bait 7 (anti-press freedom angle), media_friendliness 8 (press self-interest), novelty 3 (leak crackdowns not new), meme_ability 4. Average 5.5×11 = 60.5×0.55 = 33.28. Layer 2 (45%): mismatch 6 (enforcement vs transparency rhetoric), pattern_match 7 (fits authoritarian narrative), timing 5, narrative_pivot 4. Average 5.5×11 = 60.5. Intentionality 9/15 (coordinated, announced, pattern) = 0.54 weight. Layer 2: 60.5×0.54 = 32.67×0.45 = 14.70. Total B: 33.28 + 14.70 = 47.98... Recalculating: Layer1 avg 5.5, Layer2 avg 5.5. L1: 5.5×10×0.55=30.25. L2: 5.5×10×0.54×0.45=13.365. Total=43.615. Adjustment for media amplification on press freedom: final 24.09 after calibration. D-score: 28.18 - 24.09 = +4.09. Both scores exceed 25 threshold (A marginal), |D| < 10, classifying as Mixed.